.
Feedback

San Mateo County Residents Have Host of Tax Measures on June 5 Ballot

Voters will see several business-related taxes and a handful of school parcel tax and bond measures in the June 5 primary.

San Mateo County voters will consider several business-related taxes and a handful of school parcel tax and bond measures in the June 5 primary.

Among the most contentious measures on the ballot are a proposed transient occupancy tax increase and business license taxes for commercial parking and car rental businesses in unincorporated areas of the county.

Proponents of all three measures include Board of Supervisors President Adrienne Tissier, Supervisor Carole Groom and San Mateo County Schools Superintendent Ann Campbell.

Opponents include the citizens' group Taxpayers for a Strong Economy and the general managers of the Best Western Grosvenor and San Francisco Airport Marriott hotels.

Measure U would raise the transient occupancy tax paid by guests at hotels in unincorporated areas from 10 percent to 12 percent.

Supporters say Measure U would bring the transient occupancy tax in line with that of neighboring cities and counties. Opponents argue that the transient occupancy tax increase would hurt the hotel industry and discourage tourism.

Measure X proposes an 8 percent business license tax on all commercial parking facilities in unincorporated areas. The measure could raise approximately $5 million annually for the county's general fund, according to the measure's supporters.

Opponents claim the new tax would add to the high cost of living on the Peninsula because the cost would be passed on to consumers.

Measure T would levy a 2.5 percent business license tax on all car rental businesses in unincorporated areas.

Proponents say car rental businesses pay less than 1 percent tax to the county, and that more than doubling the tax could raise nearly $8 million annually.

Opponents say that any new taxes in a sluggish economy are a bad idea. All three business tax measures require a simple majority to pass.

The June 5 ballot also includes three measures that would benefit local school districts.

Measure S would authorize the issuance of $81 million in 40-year bonds for the Cabrillo Unified School District, which includes four elementary schools, Cunha Intermediate School, an alternative education school, and Half Moon Bay High.

The funds would help pay for school facility upgrades and maintenance. The bond measure requires 55 percent approval to pass.

Measure Y would levy a $45 annual tax on parcels within the Jefferson Union High School District for four years. The money would be used to enhance classroom programs and computer instruction, and attract and retain teachers.

In the Redwood City Elementary School District, Measure W aims to raise revenue for reading, writing and math programs, school libraries and other uses. The measure proposes a $67 parcel tax that would be in effect for five years.

Measures Y and W both require two-thirds voter approval to pass. Two special district taxes are on the ballot for voters in Portola Valley and the unincorporated San Mateo neighborhood of Highlands.

Measure V would raise an annual parcel tax on properties in Portola Valley's Wayside II Road Maintenance District from $625 to $950. The funds would be used to cover the increasing costs of road maintenance and repair within the district.

Measure Z would extend a $65 annual parcel tax for police and fire services in the Highlands neighborhood. The tax has been in effect since 1982 and requires reauthorization by voters every four years.

Both Measures Z and V require a two-thirds majority to pass.

-- Bay City News

 

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Mateo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Pearl June 13, 2013 at 02:15 pm
This is a compete outrage!!! A 12.7% salary increase?!? A 100% increase in his car allowance?!?Read More I say get rid of Grasseli, Olbert, Collins and Clapper. Shame, shame, shame on them!!! They have sold the residents of San Carlos down the river!!! Remember this, San Carlos voters, the next time you go to the polls!!!
Paul Burnette and Grant Wood prepare to cut the ribbon with Deputy Mayor Ross
Kimberly Jennings May 29, 2013 at 10:14 am
How exciting to have some of the best orthotic specialists in the WORLD right here in our ownRead More backyard, and with such a commitment to patient care as their top priority! So glad to read this.
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 03:53 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class once we get you in! Thank you!
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 06:25 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class... and CSM... once we get you in! ALL WELCOME! Thank you!
Peter Radsliff May 27, 2013 at 08:56 pm
We have left the dog with the Peninsula Humane Society at 12 Airport Blvd. at Peninsula Ave.
imollyq May 30, 2013 at 09:55 pm
Among all the supporters isn't there one competent attorney who can get an injunction to keep theRead More rink from being destroyed and who can sue SPI Holding, and if necessary the City, to enforce the Master Plan Agreement? A toilet and an astro turf field are useless to ice skaters. I smell something rotten in the Mayor and the City Council's excuses. At least one skater must have a parent or family member who is an attorney with some sense of decency to do the work pro bono.
Claire Mack June 2, 2013 at 09:21 am
To close the ice rink is a crime. I had this conversation years ago with Peter Pau, the man whoRead More built it. We need places for children to recreate. When we send them to juvenile hall, we wring our hands and wonder why! No skate board parks in convenient places and now the skating rink. Why are our children the ones to sacrafice?