.
Feedback

Hill: Public Shouldn't Have to Pay for Upgrades to PG&E Gas System

State Assemblyman Jerry Hill is urging the California Public Utilities Commission not to let PG&E saddle ratepayers for nearly $5 billion in costs for upgrading to the state's aging gas transmission system.

 

State Assemblyman Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) and Mark Toney, executive director of the Utility Reform Network, will be making a public statement Monday urging the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to reject Pacific Gas & Electric Co.’s (PG&E) proposal to raise utilities rates in order to recoup costs of its long-awaited project to modernize California's gas transmission system - an effort Hill calls "ratepayer gouging."

Hill says, any day now, the CPUC is expected to release a decision proposing, for the first time, how much ratepayers should be billed to fix PG&E's "neglected" gas transmission system.

If the commission grants PG&E’s request to saddle ratepayers with 95 percent of the $5 billion the first phase of PG&E's project is expected to cost, the utility stands to make a $1.5-billion profit from the deadly 2010 San Bruno gas explosion, thanks to a commission policy that grants the utility a generous return on its capital investment, Hill said in a statement released Friday.

Meanwhile, Hill says PG&E and other utilities are using their clout in Sacramento to try and kill his bill, AB 861, which would prohibit ratepayer money from being used to pay for executive incentives based on corporate earnings or share price.

“As a publicly-regulated company, the only way PG&E can increase its earnings is by cutting its operations and maintenance costs, which undermines safety,” Hill said, noting that in the years leading to the San Bruno explosion, PG&E executives were granted bonuses for cutting costs.

Hill, who represents San Bruno, is urging the CPUC to require PG&E to pay a fair share of the costs of modernizing its gas transmission system. The commission will be able to vote on the proposed decision 30 days after it is released. 

“Ratepayers shouldn’t have to pay PG&E higher utility bills for a level of service they should have been receiving all along,” Hill said.

Hill and Toney will make an appearance Monday at 10 a.m. in the CPUC courtyard at 505 Van Ness Ave. in San Francisco.

 

For local news such as this wherever you go, follow us! And don't forget to sign up for our daily e-newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox.

Follow San Mateo Patch on Twitter | Like San Mateo Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the San Mateo Patch daily newsletter | Blog for San Mateo Patch

Follow Foster City Patch on Twitter | Like Foster City Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the Foster City Patch daily newsletter | Blog for Foster City Patch


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Mateo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bren May 19, 2013 at 06:49 pm
I see that I meant to type "...that connect us to the past," but I accidentally typedRead More "...and connect us to the past." I think my meaning came through, though. Yes, the world does not need another national chain retail store or restaurant, which is surely what they're planning to put in there.
CP May 19, 2013 at 02:22 pm
Yes Bren, agree with you....good point.....really what it seems to come down to is money vs. theRead More good of the community and richness of traditions. And all despite the Master Plan for that site in San Mateo that seems to require an ice skating rink or similar recreational facility AT THAT SITE, and all despite the fact the Ice Chalet would like to continue operations there. The Developer has made it difficult to impossible for any ice rink to operate there (tricky it seems)....so they can get a cookie cutter retail outlet in ? .....very, very sad for the youth of the community.
Bren May 17, 2013 at 10:09 am
I think the issue is much larger than whether children will experience stress. That ice rink is aRead More local institution, dating back at least to when Fashion Island was there. It's terrible for communities to lose so many landmarks and connect us to the past.
Anita Reimann April 29, 2013 at 11:43 am
Dear Ari, Thank you for your service to our community. It's wonderful that you are already making aRead More difference.