.
Feedback

Proposition 8 to be Heard by Supreme Court in March

The high court's decision is expected by the end of June.

 

By Bay City News Service

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear arguments on March 26 on whether it was constitutional for California voters to ban same-sex marriage through a 2008 ballot measure.

Sponsors of Proposition 8 and their committee, Protect Marriage, are appealing a ruling in which the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year struck down the initiative.

The high court's decision is expected by the end of June.

In the meantime, a stay of the lower court decision will remain in place and Proposition 8 will continue to be in effect.

The court announced one month ago, on Dec. 7, that it would consider the appeal, but did not specify the argument date until now.

The court will also hear arguments on a related New York case concerning the federal Defense of Marriage Act on March 27.

The federal law, known as DOMA, bars the U.S. government from providing federal benefits and tax advantages to same-sex couples who were legally married in their state.

In the Proposition 8 case, the initiative's sponsors contend that California voters were entitled to decide to preserve the definition of marriage as the union of a man and a woman. They say that each state, working through its legislature or voters, has the right to define marriage within its territory.

Two same-sex couples who challenged Proposition 8 in a civil rights lawsuit filed in federal court in San Francisco in 2009 say the ban violates their constitutional right to equal treatment.

The court's nine justices will hear at least one hour of arguments in their Washington, D.C., courthouse beginning at 7 a.m. PST.

Copyright © 2013 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Mateo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bren May 19, 2013 at 06:49 pm
I see that I meant to type "...that connect us to the past," but I accidentally typedRead More "...and connect us to the past." I think my meaning came through, though. Yes, the world does not need another national chain retail store or restaurant, which is surely what they're planning to put in there.
CP May 19, 2013 at 02:22 pm
Yes Bren, agree with you....good point.....really what it seems to come down to is money vs. theRead More good of the community and richness of traditions. And all despite the Master Plan for that site in San Mateo that seems to require an ice skating rink or similar recreational facility AT THAT SITE, and all despite the fact the Ice Chalet would like to continue operations there. The Developer has made it difficult to impossible for any ice rink to operate there (tricky it seems)....so they can get a cookie cutter retail outlet in ? .....very, very sad for the youth of the community.
Bren May 17, 2013 at 10:09 am
I think the issue is much larger than whether children will experience stress. That ice rink is aRead More local institution, dating back at least to when Fashion Island was there. It's terrible for communities to lose so many landmarks and connect us to the past.
Anita Reimann April 29, 2013 at 11:43 am
Dear Ari, Thank you for your service to our community. It's wonderful that you are already making aRead More difference.