.
Feedback

Prison Realignment Leading to More Prisoners, Probation Than Expected

Roughly 15 percent more prisoners and probation cases that would normally be sent to or handled by the state prison are now under County control, under realignment.

 

The number of inmates and parolees in San Mateo County as a result of realignment is about 15 percent higher than what state officials projected, according to a report presented Tuesday to the Board of Supervisors.

The report, called the Public Safety Realignment Local Implementation Report, shows that the number of non-violent, non-high-risk offenders whose cases are being assigned to the County Probation Department instead of state parole is about 15 percent higher than what state analysts predicted when realignment began in October of 2011.

The number of inmates being sentenced to serve time in County jail rather than state prison under realignment is also about 15 percent more than what was predicted, county legislative coordinator Connie Juarez-Diroll said.

"The State Department of Finance had run some early projections to give to counties to begin planning for realignment," Juarez-Diroll said. "We're finding that the numbers are slightly higher than what had been predicted."

Approximately 170 inmates that would have gone to state prison have been sentenced to County jail under realignment, according to the report.

The influx of new inmates has resulted in a 53 percent increase in sentenced days at the jail facility. Around 82 percent of those inmates are men, and around 31 percent are between 30 and 39 years old.

Approximately 260 Post-Release Community Supervisees have had their cases newly assigned to the San Mateo County Probation Department under realignment. Nearly 87 percent of those have a moderate- or high-risk of re-offending, according to the report. So far, around 26 percent have new arrest warrants, 19 percent have been arrested for new offenses, and 7 percent have had their probation revoked.

The majority of the PCRS supervisees are from Daly City, South San Francisco, East Palo Alto and Redwood City. Around 13 percent are transient.

When realignment began last year, the Board of Supervisors requested that quarterly reports being given on the impacts of the plan on various departments. 

- Bay City News

 

For hyperlocal news such as this wherever you go, follow us!

Follow San Mateo Patch on Twitter | Like San Mateo Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the San Mateo Patch daily newsletter | Blog for San Mateo Patch

Follow Foster City Patch on Twitter | Like Foster City Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the Foster City Patch daily newsletter | Blog for Foster City Patch


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Mateo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Pearl June 13, 2013 at 02:15 pm
This is a compete outrage!!! A 12.7% salary increase?!? A 100% increase in his car allowance?!?Read More I say get rid of Grasseli, Olbert, Collins and Clapper. Shame, shame, shame on them!!! They have sold the residents of San Carlos down the river!!! Remember this, San Carlos voters, the next time you go to the polls!!!
Paul Burnette and Grant Wood prepare to cut the ribbon with Deputy Mayor Ross
Kimberly Jennings May 29, 2013 at 10:14 am
How exciting to have some of the best orthotic specialists in the WORLD right here in our ownRead More backyard, and with such a commitment to patient care as their top priority! So glad to read this.
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 03:53 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class once we get you in! Thank you!
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 06:25 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class... and CSM... once we get you in! ALL WELCOME! Thank you!
Peter Radsliff May 27, 2013 at 08:56 pm
We have left the dog with the Peninsula Humane Society at 12 Airport Blvd. at Peninsula Ave.
imollyq May 30, 2013 at 09:55 pm
Among all the supporters isn't there one competent attorney who can get an injunction to keep theRead More rink from being destroyed and who can sue SPI Holding, and if necessary the City, to enforce the Master Plan Agreement? A toilet and an astro turf field are useless to ice skaters. I smell something rotten in the Mayor and the City Council's excuses. At least one skater must have a parent or family member who is an attorney with some sense of decency to do the work pro bono.
Claire Mack June 2, 2013 at 09:21 am
To close the ice rink is a crime. I had this conversation years ago with Peter Pau, the man whoRead More built it. We need places for children to recreate. When we send them to juvenile hall, we wring our hands and wonder why! No skate board parks in convenient places and now the skating rink. Why are our children the ones to sacrafice?