.
Feedback

Defendants Plead Not Guilty to 2010 Shooting

Most defendants in the South San Francisco 2010 triple homicide case pleaded not guilty to charges ranging from obstruction to conspiracy to racketeering murder at a hearing Friday.

The majority of the 19 defendants pleaded not guilty to federal charges Friday relating to .

Of the 15 defendants who made their first appearance in United States District Court in this case today before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, 13 pleaded not guilty to charges ranging from obstruction of justice, conspiracy to commit murder in aid of racketeering and racketeering murder. Two others, Richard Martinez, 25, and Andrew Bryant, 29, deferred pleas until their attorneys could appear with them.

Four additional defendants, Benjamin Campos-Gonzalez, 21, Rodrigo Aguayo, 23, Gregorio Guzman, 38, and Peter Davis, 26, are in state custody and will be transferred to federal custody next week to face charges.

Campos-Gonzalez, as well as Joseph Ortiz, 22, Justin Whipple, 19, and Victor Flores, 20, are charged with racketeering murder and .

Friday’s hearing was largely procedural as Judge Spero appointed attorneys for the defendants, accepted pleas and scheduled bail hearings. But some details did emerge about the government’s case and the relationship between the defendants.

The defendants include five family members who are all charged in aspects of the crime: Joseph Ortiz, his brother, Michael Ortiz, Jr., 25, his father, Michael Ortiz, Sr., 48, his mother, Tanya Rodriguez, 45, and his aunt, Betty Ortiz, 49.  

The indictment accuses Joseph Ortiz of being one of the shooters, and the government has charged him with three counts of racketeering murder, which carries a minimum sentence of life in prison and a maximum sentence of death for each count.

Ortiz is also charged with racketeering conspiracy, conspiracy to commit murder in aid of racketeering, conspiracy to commit assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering and obstruction. Ortiz is additionally with four counts of attempted murder in aid of racketeering and a firearms offense relating to a Dec. 18, 2010 shooting in Daly City.

In a separate trial that starts Monday, Ortiz is charged with armed robbery and use of a firearm in the April 5, 2010 robbery of jewelry store Joyeria Deira at 349 Grand Avenue.

His father and brother, Michael Ortiz, Sr., and Michael Ortiz, Jr., are charged with conspiracy and being an accessories after the fact to the South San Francisco shooting.

When Judge Spero asked Ortiz, Sr., if he understood the charges against him, he replied, “I don’t because this is a mistake. I didn’t do nothing.”

Ortiz’s mother, Tanya Rodriguez, is charged with being an accessory after the fact. When her lawyer asked Assistant U.S. Attorney W.S. Wilson Leung to explain why the government objected to bail in her case, Leung said the government has wiretap evidence of a scheme to help her son, Joseph Ortiz, flee the country. She assisted her son’s flight to Mexico, helped others wire him money and Ortiz smuggled her to Mexico as well, Leung said.

Michael Ortiz, Sr.’s lawyer argued that as Joseph Ortiz’s case has been going on over the past two months, his parents have made every court appearance and thus aren’t flight risks. Their bail hearings were scheduled for next week.

Ortiz’s aunt, Betty Ortiz, is charged with being an accessory after the fact. Her lawyer said she has leukemia and needs medication daily.

The government’s argument rests on the allegation that all defendants were members or associates of the and carried out the shooting as part of a racketeering enterprise that included other criminal activity, including “narcotics trafficking, extortion, robbery, and murder,” according to a statement by the U.S. Attorney’s office.

Friday’s hearing was held in a secure courtroom where entrance and exit was regulated. Family members of victim Gonzalo Avalos came to the hearing, as well as relatives of the defendants. Several cried and shook their heads as Judge Spero read the charges and potential sentences.

After the hearing concluded, one woman moved closer to the defendants and said to a loved one, “I love you with all my heart.”

After their bail hearings, the defendants will next appear in court on June 22 before Judge Susan Illston for a status update.

 

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Mateo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Pearl June 13, 2013 at 02:15 pm
This is a compete outrage!!! A 12.7% salary increase?!? A 100% increase in his car allowance?!?Read More I say get rid of Grasseli, Olbert, Collins and Clapper. Shame, shame, shame on them!!! They have sold the residents of San Carlos down the river!!! Remember this, San Carlos voters, the next time you go to the polls!!!
Paul Burnette and Grant Wood prepare to cut the ribbon with Deputy Mayor Ross
Kimberly Jennings May 29, 2013 at 10:14 am
How exciting to have some of the best orthotic specialists in the WORLD right here in our ownRead More backyard, and with such a commitment to patient care as their top priority! So glad to read this.
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 03:53 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class once we get you in! Thank you!
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 06:25 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class... and CSM... once we get you in! ALL WELCOME! Thank you!
Peter Radsliff May 27, 2013 at 08:56 pm
We have left the dog with the Peninsula Humane Society at 12 Airport Blvd. at Peninsula Ave.
imollyq May 30, 2013 at 09:55 pm
Among all the supporters isn't there one competent attorney who can get an injunction to keep theRead More rink from being destroyed and who can sue SPI Holding, and if necessary the City, to enforce the Master Plan Agreement? A toilet and an astro turf field are useless to ice skaters. I smell something rotten in the Mayor and the City Council's excuses. At least one skater must have a parent or family member who is an attorney with some sense of decency to do the work pro bono.
Claire Mack June 2, 2013 at 09:21 am
To close the ice rink is a crime. I had this conversation years ago with Peter Pau, the man whoRead More built it. We need places for children to recreate. When we send them to juvenile hall, we wring our hands and wonder why! No skate board parks in convenient places and now the skating rink. Why are our children the ones to sacrafice?