.
Feedback

Caltrain Gets Financial Green Light for Electrification

Agency officials announced Thursday morning the California High Speed Rail Authority and more than a half-dozen Bay Area public agencies will fully fund the electrification and modernization of the Caltrain system.

Caltrain is one step closer to receiving the electrification and modernization officials say the system desperately needs.

An agreement between the California High-Speed Rail Authority and more than half a dozen Bay Area public agencies will entirely fund an upgrade to the system, which includes modernization, agency spokeswoman Christine Dunn announced in a statement Thursday morning.

According to Dunn, the funding agreement uses local, regional and federal dollars to leverage hundreds of millions of dollars matched by the high-speed rail authority.

The electrification and modernization of Caltrain have been in the works for more than a decade, and are "critically-needed improvements that will dramatically improve the service and help ensure the long-term viability of the commuter rail system," Dunn said in the statement.

The announcement comes just a week after Assemblyman Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, Peninsula residents at a news conference at the San Mateo Caltrain Station to get on board with the electrification of Caltrain.

Once the system is electrified, Caltrain will be able to operate lighter-weight electric vehicles with major performance advantages compared to the existing diesel rail technology.

Trains will be faster, cleaner, quieter and more efficient, according to Caltrain officials.

In addition, riders will see more frequent service to more stations, which will result in increased ridership and prepare the system to accommodate future job growth.

Modernizing Caltrain is also an important step in stabilizing the rail agency’s long-struggling finances. Caltrain is one of the few transit agencies in the country that does not have its own, dedicated tax base or source of revenue.

“Electrification is an essential improvement that is critical to the future of the system,” Executive Director Mike Scanlon said in a statement.

“This is an enormous step forward that prioritizes these improvements and delivers early benefits to the Caltrain system, its riders and surrounding communities,” he said.

Plans for the electrification of Caltrain still need to be approved by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission at its meeting next week, as well as the boards of all the public agencies, and the state legislature will also need to sign off on the bond, Caltrain spokesman Seamus Murphy said.

If approved, Caltrain could be electrified as soon as 2020, more than a decade before it is assumed in the most recent version of the High Speed Rail Business Plan.

Caltrain is currently assessing the possibilities of various blended system alternatives to the four-track system, which the agency opposes, to determine what specific infrastructure improvements will eventually be needed to support high-speed rail and how they can be designed to minimize impacts on surrounding communities.

Mike V March 22, 2012 at 02:02 pm
This is excellent news. I've been a daily Caltrain commuter for almost 10 years and believe it's critical to the Bay Area transportation infrastructure. Interestingly the trains have become much more crowded over the past few months in my experience - perhaps as gas prices rise, more people are realizing the benefits of Caltrain.
Bob March 22, 2012 at 02:18 pm
I am curious, will this electrification of the train result in raising the elevation of the tracks the same as the High Speed Rail? The reason I ask is the proposed build outs at Ralston and Nesbit schools will be harder to access during the construction phase which based on reported projections is exactly the time access will be needed most!
Michael Williams March 22, 2012 at 03:16 pm
It's time to get real: This should be BART and high-speed rail on the Southern Pacific right-of-way. CalTrain is an anachronism in every sense. It's service is inadequate, disconnected from every other transit system, and unusable for tens of thousands of commuters to and from San Francisco and Silicon Valley.
San Mateo is now economically connected, deeply and permanently, to the business assets of the Greater Bay Region - we need fully connected, efficient access to the region's job opportunities and our businesses need access to the region's skilled labor resources. BART is now working on completing its East Bay and South Bay service all the way from Richmond and Pittsburgh in the north to downtown San Jose. San Mateo now needs to provide the missing link for full BART service on the western side of the Bay. Not another penny for CalTain. Not another penny for 101 expansion. We need to invest in a real transportation solution.
Andrew Boone March 22, 2012 at 04:17 pm
No. Electrified Caltrain trains would run on the existing tracks, as would High Speed Rail trains under the currently favored "blended system" proposal.
d wave March 22, 2012 at 04:47 pm
i'm delighted to see funding put to better use. as for the dreams of BART - when I first showed my 8 year old nephew a map of the system his first question was, "why doesn't it go all around the bay?". We'd all like a better PT system but we'll have to settle (at least in this generation) for what ever manifests itself.
Probably the biggest single thing we could do for future generations public transit is to acquire the property required. This is good news though - a rare instance of government doing something that makes sense.
Joseph Heston March 22, 2012 at 05:48 pm
Just think. There will be a new market for used AEM-7s and ALP-44s.
Bob March 22, 2012 at 06:17 pm
Are you sure about the tracks staying at current height? Everything that I have seen including the shared platform has the tracks being several feet higher than they are currently. It has to do with the height requirements of electrical wires.
http://www.belmont.gov/Upload/Document/D240006266/High%20Speed%20Rail%20in%20Belmont.pdf
Foghorn Leghorn March 23, 2012 at 10:37 am
Elevated rail+ BART= more crime. Any local police officer who was around when BART came to Millbrae will tell you that crime in Millbrae and the northern part of Burlingame had a 20% increase. All of you utopian wonks should be careful what you wish for. Go ahead and tell me how progressive you are if your rings and pocket watches are gone and if your children start hangin' ghetto.BART station near Burlingame High School. Bad idea. As for "electrification"? It is still a coal driven train and there is no such as such thing as cheap electricity.
Andrew Boone March 23, 2012 at 12:55 pm
I agree - I would definitely prefer for BART to encircle the Bay over an electrified Caltrain. Anybody know how much that would cost?
Adina Levin March 23, 2012 at 09:56 pm
Coal accounts for about 1% of electric power generation in California. The top sources are natural gas, hydro, renewables, and nuclear.
As for the scary people riding the trains, I don't know what to say about that one. There are also alligators crawling in the sewers under your house, and helicopters circling and watching you, and other reasonable things to be afraid of.
Adina Levin March 23, 2012 at 10:01 pm
Replacing Caltrain with BART would cost $10+ Billion. Electrifying Caltrain is about $1.5 billion. So, ripping up Caltrain and replacing it with BART isn't that great a deal. Electrification will let Caltrain run more frequently, which is currently its big disadvantage.
M Z March 23, 2012 at 11:16 pm
Foghorn, wow! The people that I see on BART are all just trying to get from point a (home) to point b (work) and back again. I have been using BART for 30 plus years and never had a problem. My kids love to take all forms of public transportation. The transportation I do not take is Caltrain after a game or something that has a lot of people getting on. That was the worst. People drinking, throwing up, etc.
Joe Russo March 24, 2012 at 01:09 am
I live in SoCal and travel to Silicon Valley and SF often. We can only dream of a BART system here.. It should replace CalTrain. $10 billion sounds like a lot of money to some people but these days $10 billion changes hands in a nanosecond on the NYSE. The SF Terminal located such as it is, is a big turnoff to taking CalTrain. If the trains ran under Market Street, the ridership would probably triple. Also, what is more dumb than that transfer between CalTrain and BART at Milbrae, fumbling for change at the few ticket machines available. How about applying some Silicon Valley brainpower to solving this rather basic problem?
Austin Choi March 24, 2012 at 01:57 am
I used to take Caltrain to San Bruno and sometimes to San Jose. It's a fairly good reliable system, just like Bart. I think if it connects to downtown SF, Caltrain ridership would rise, though likely at a high cost to riders.
Jeffrey Castaline March 29, 2012 at 12:40 pm
So, in other words, limiting public transportation will keep the undesirables out of your backyard? And 'hangin' ghetto', sounds like a mildly discriminating turn of a phrase. Perhaps people would pay more attention to what YOUR 'opinions' are if you posted with your real name instead of hiding behind the name of a rabble rousing fictional chicken.
katie January 19, 2013 at 12:01 am
What is the status of electrification of Caltrain? Can we start taking these trains underground the horns are unbearably loud at night.
Adina Levin January 20, 2013 at 08:23 pm
Electrification is scheduled to be done in 2019. The electric trains themselves will be quieter horns are needed because of at-grade crossings. San Mateo is applying for grade separation funding, but not for all of the at-grade crossings.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Mateo Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Pearl June 13, 2013 at 02:15 pm
This is a compete outrage!!! A 12.7% salary increase?!? A 100% increase in his car allowance?!?Read More I say get rid of Grasseli, Olbert, Collins and Clapper. Shame, shame, shame on them!!! They have sold the residents of San Carlos down the river!!! Remember this, San Carlos voters, the next time you go to the polls!!!
Paul Burnette and Grant Wood prepare to cut the ribbon with Deputy Mayor Ross
Kimberly Jennings May 29, 2013 at 10:14 am
How exciting to have some of the best orthotic specialists in the WORLD right here in our ownRead More backyard, and with such a commitment to patient care as their top priority! So glad to read this.
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 03:53 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class once we get you in! Thank you!
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 06:25 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class... and CSM... once we get you in! ALL WELCOME! Thank you!
Peter Radsliff May 27, 2013 at 08:56 pm
We have left the dog with the Peninsula Humane Society at 12 Airport Blvd. at Peninsula Ave.
imollyq May 30, 2013 at 09:55 pm
Among all the supporters isn't there one competent attorney who can get an injunction to keep theRead More rink from being destroyed and who can sue SPI Holding, and if necessary the City, to enforce the Master Plan Agreement? A toilet and an astro turf field are useless to ice skaters. I smell something rotten in the Mayor and the City Council's excuses. At least one skater must have a parent or family member who is an attorney with some sense of decency to do the work pro bono.
Claire Mack June 2, 2013 at 09:21 am
To close the ice rink is a crime. I had this conversation years ago with Peter Pau, the man whoRead More built it. We need places for children to recreate. When we send them to juvenile hall, we wring our hands and wonder why! No skate board parks in convenient places and now the skating rink. Why are our children the ones to sacrafice?