patching...
Poll: Who serves the best burrito in San Mateo? Click here to vote! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Abercrombie & Fitch Sued Over Headscarf Firing

A San Mateo woman is taking the retailer to court after being let go from Hillsdale Mall location.

 

A San Mateo woman is suing Abercrombie & Fitch after she was allegedly fired from her job at the company’s Hillsdale Shopping Center outlet for not removing her headscarf.

The woman, who has not been identified, is a Muslim, and “she was told that her headscarf, though worn based on a religious mandate, was not in compliance with the company's ‘look policy,’” said those representing her in the lawsuit. She worked at Hollister Co., a subsidiary of Abercrombie & Fitch, in 2009 and 2010.

Some Muslim traditions require that women wear the headscarf, or hijab, when out in public.

Her case has been taken up by the Legal Aid Society of San Francisco - Employment Law Center, a group that works to defend the rights of the socially disadvantaged. Christopher Herrera, a spokesman for the group, said the case “came to us through the Council on American-Islamic Relations. They know that we work with employment issues and with discrimination issues regarding employment.”

The Legal Aid Society and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) are filing the suit on Monday in San Francisco, after which a news conference will be held. The conference is scheduled for 10 a.m. at the legal group’s offices at 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600, San Francisco.

CAIR describes itself as “America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization.”

According to a press release issued by both groups, “The plaintiff worked for Hollister Co., a brand of Abercrombie & Fitch, for several months in 2009-10 while wearing a hijab. In February 2010, she was terminated from her position as a stockroom employee after refusing to remove her scarf."

Herrera said he could not comment further on the case until the lawsuit is filed Monday.

The suit is being filed in conjunction with a lawsuit already filed against Abercrombie & Fitch by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the group said.

Abercrombie & Fitch representatives were not immediately available for comment.

Related Topics: Headscarf, Hollister Co., and abercrombie & fitch

Don Frances

9:43 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

No, CAIR is not a terrorist organization. The point about "Mormon underwear" is also dubious -- I don't think a devout Muslim, Mormon or anyone else would consider employment at Hooters.

Remember that in this case, according to her representatives, this woman worked in the stockroom of the clothing outlet -- she didn't deal with the public.

Comment_arrow

terry c.

11:00 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

...if the policy was in place when she was offered employment, and i imagine it was, when she accepted the job, she agrees to the company policies in place. if these were not enforced when she first went to work- for a variety of reasons, they are still valid job requirements.

Jeff

9:54 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

What I don't understand is, didn't they know she was wearing a hijab before they hired her? Did she mis-represent herself during the hiring process by not wearing a hijab and once she landed the job did she show up wearing the headgear?

Rod husband

10:03 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

She didn't know what A&F stands for as a company? They used to sell thongs for kids! And not the flip flop thongs either!

Dick

10:48 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

If she wasn't dealing with the public, I don't see why her headscarf should matter.

Come on, A&F, not everyone can be an anorexic preppy kid with too much money on their hands.

J

11:20 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

If she was working in the backroom which is NOT out in the public why was she wearing the (To be worn out in public ) scarf?????

Comment_arrow

staki08

12:53 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Actually, under Muslim law, a women does not have to wear the headscarf in front of her husband, father, brothers, uncles, father-in-law, grandfathers, and so forth. She needs to wear it in front of other men, whether out in the public or at home. Therefore, I believe the term "out in public" should have been further explained.

Dotty

11:25 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Even if she was dealing with the public, there is nothing wrong with wearing a headscarf.

Comment_arrow

Dawn

12:56 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

In the home of the "free", doesn't this company have a "right" to a certain fashionable dress code? There are certain things some people can't do.....blind people cannot get a driver's license, it that unfair?
If her religion is so restricted, she will face restrictions, freedom is for all....not just muslims.

Comment_arrow

Dotty

1:39 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

*sigh* So corporate freedom is more important than individual freedom?

Comment_arrow

Allee

7:42 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

A woman wearing a headscarf won't cause danger/harm/death to anyone, unlike a blind person driving. Did you really go there?!.........

dijiba

11:29 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Even if she was working in public...what's the big deal? Are we as Americans so terrified by a simple piece of fabric. If so, how tragic are we.

switz

11:38 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

There are rules at every work place. Please let me be on the jury. She won't get a dime.

Comment_arrow

bigben

2:03 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

like you have to be blond, blue eyes, and gay, how's that for a work place rule. Company dress codes usually lean towards the conservative side- to project a professional image. Wearing a headcover be it a scarf or jamaca, should not be included in such dress codes. Some jackass will undoubtedly push the limits and wear headpieces like those you see in Brazil's Carnival, but hey those people are just aholes- trying to make a point.

iain young

11:42 am on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Never understood why women have to cover their head with a cloth in Muslim religion and in the Vatican too while an uncovered male head is OK . Is it the long hair or is it subjugation of women that is the issue? My money is on the latter.
A woman is the goddess and can be celebrated as the divine manifestation of the female aspect of Allah or Jehova or that which is beyond form and formlessness. No piece of cloth can cover that up.

Comment_arrow

staki08

12:49 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

From Whyislam.org:

Why do Muslim women veil themselves?

The modest attire of Muslim women has become so commonplace, that hijab, the Arabic word used to refer to the Islamic dress code, is now commonly used in English. One of the most visible aspects of Islam, hijab is often the subject of controversy as well. Some view it as a sign of the subjugation of Muslim women, while some others see it as an obstacle to the integration of Muslims in Western society.

However, to Muslim women who practice hijab, it represents an act of obedience to God. It also represents a step towards freedom, i.e. freedom from being judged by their looks rather than their intellect.

Modesty – Required of both men and women

A common misconception about hijab is that it is mandated only for women. Hijab is actually mandated for both men and women. The difference lies in how they are required to implement it. The Glorious Qur’an says:

“Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that will make for greater purity for them; and Allah is well acquainted with all that they do. And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; and that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what must ordinarily appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands…”

[Al-Qur'an 24:30-31]

staki08

12:49 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Both men and women are required to dress and conduct themselves in a manner that befits their dignity and is not the cause of temptation for others. Hair is considered part of a woman’s physical attractiveness. Therefore, covering of hair for the woman is considered essential to modesty of her attire, even in the Bible. This is the reason that nuns and orthodox Jewish women also cover their hair.

It is the outer dress of Muslim women which includes the head covering that is usually referred to as hijab. Hijab is not merely a covering dress, but more importantly, it is behavior, manners, speech and appearance in public. The headscarf is an outer manifestation of an inner commitment to worshipping Allah – it symbolizes a commitment to piety. Self or inner morality is what gives meaning to the external scarf.

In the opinion of the majority of Muslim scholars, a woman should cover everything except her face and hands. The face veil however, is worn by some Muslim women, who either consider it a requirement, or wish to adhere to a higher level of modesty.

Hijab – A liberation

In a society in which women’s beauty has been commoditized, and where women often end up associating their self-worth with their looks, the hijab and its concomitant de-emphasis of physical beauty can be tremendously liberating. Muslim women wear the hijab out of obedience to God, while recognizing the immense wisdom behind His commandment

Comment_arrow

Alexander Cardosa

12:57 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Mindless dribble from bronze age believe. So here is my question do women get to have multiple men? If not then not much of a Religion but more of a ownership cult.

Comment_arrow

bigben

2:11 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Liberating means- not allowed to drive ? or go to university, or get a job based on ability rather than gender ?
I agree that the covering one's extremeties is liberating in the sense that when you are in public you avoid the untoward advances of lascivious men and boys. It is certainly not liberating when it comes to personal rights.

Comment_arrow

staki08

2:24 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

To big ben, it's funny how you mentioned tht Cristina is showing her intolerance, while you don't notice what your messages sound like. I do not mean to come off as rude, but with the internet nowadays, it would be better off to do some research before posting a very ignorant comment about "not allowed to drive...etc." Islam provides so much equality for women, in fact, it encourages them to obtain an education, secures their rights in marriage, and puts them in very high regards. It is important not to get Islam, the religion, confused with some wrong traditions that certain places might have. Again, just look it up online...whyislam.org is a great website that will explain women's rights in Islam, and I think you will be taken aback once you read a bit.

Comment_arrow

leciat

6:35 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

right staki08 because if i go the ISLAMIC republic of iran or to saudi arabia and ask the ISLAMIC clerics who impose ISLAMIC laws they will tell me that women not being allowed to drive, stoning women for being raped and women not being able to leave their house without a male relative is not islam it is culture they are enforcing

and your right big ben women must be protected from “lascivious men and boys” because you know, men can’t help themselves when they see female skin they have to have sex they can not control their animal instincts. The “west” is evil and decadent because they force women to display their bodies to please the evil men. So the answer is to force women to hide from public view as to not incite the poor men

Dotty

1:01 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Cristina Pendleton, I agree that many of the people commenting here are uninformed/unenlightened. However disparaging women in tight tank tops showing off their "goodies"--they're called breasts-- is not the answer either. Here's something thought-provoking: http://jezebel.com/5659357/does-niqabitch-enrich-the-burqa-ban-debate

staki08

1:02 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Alexander, please do some research on the internet before you say that someone does it out of fear from being killed from their own family, otherwise, you sound extremely ignorant.

Donna Gorman

1:11 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

She worked there and wore the scarf for several months before they fired her. Why did it take them so long?

Perhaps they'd forgotten to insert new rules about scarves and they needed that time to write them?

Comment_arrow

Kitt Lenington

2:01 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Federal law mandates no discrimination based on one's religion or religious beliefs.

Comment_arrow

leciat

6:37 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

or maybe they knew they would face a lawsuit when they fired her because freedom of religion means that the religious have rights that the rest of society does not have

rlivingston10116

1:17 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Company policy should not be subjected to a religious criteria, nor should law. All religion is superstition and has NO place in determining law, policy, or anything else not directly related to the practice of their particular magic.

Nhu Pham

1:47 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

I am American (NJ) currently living in singapore. There is quite a large Muslim population here and may I say that the young female muslims can be quite fashionable. Yes they wear their headscarves, cover their arms and legs but I have seen many that look down right stylish.

No one should be discriminated against because of their religion. I am much more of an atheist and I support this girl. If A&F asked someone to remove their cross on their neck, Christians would have a fit. If you are going to be religiously intolerant than it has to be across the board.

In France, girls are not allowed to wear their headscarves to school, no one can wear a cross, purity ring, or anything religious in ANY WAY!

for those posting - put the shoe on the other foot and see if it fits.

Comment_arrow

Dotty

1:58 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Nhu Pham, while France has banned conspicuous religious dress in public schools (note the word conspicuous--small crosses are still allowed), the laws are much more discriminating to many Muslim women as the country has banned any veil that covers a woman's face in any public place.

Comment_arrow

Maureen

2:02 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

That is not the issue here. The issue here is the store presents a certain image and requires that employees dress a certain way. My sister works for Macys and she has to wear black and white. Does she have a right to sue because it offends her aesthetics. People at Saks have to dress a certain way. And why would a religious muslim want to work at A&F? I am so tired of people using their religion to force THEIR choices on everyone else.
This is the clothing industry...get a job somewhere else if you don't like how you have to dress!

Comment_arrow

Nhu Pham

2:21 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Dotty - you are right. Small crosses can be worn. Did some research and was always under the impression that it was no religious symbols or trademarks in its entirety. Thanks for that.

I agree that Muslim women are extremely persecuted and think it unfair but have to be honest, the burka disturbs me as a woman and a feminist. I have not made up my mind of how I feel about the ban. I have heard both sides and still can't decide.

Maureen - A&F does try to sell an image. By not allowing her to wear her headscarf, they are saying that they do not want Muslim women as their customers. A&F is American and so are muslims. There are plenty of Muslim Americans. And seriously you are comparing your sister wearing black and white to something that is religious. This woman and many others feel naked without it. I work at a women's organization (feminist org) and there are some strong women here who are muslim and they tell me that they are just more comfortable with it and feel naked without. So if all companies wanted to discriminate, they can use this excuse? Just does not seem fair and its against the law to discriminate. It creates racism which is a societal problem. I am being nice by saying your point is very bias and small minded.

Comment_arrow

Allee

7:51 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Maureen- My friend used to be a manager at A&F and nowhere in the dress code does it say "No head-coverings." Why can't a Muslim woman work at A&F? It'd be wrong if a Muslim worked at a Bar, considering it's against Islam to drink. But what does A&F sell that would make it obscene for a Muslim to work there?

Barbara Wilcox

2:11 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

I'm shocked at the intolerance of so many responses to this story. First of all, one can like fashion and still wear a hijab. Second, the great thing about America is that we respect individuals, as well as religions -- not just OUR religion, or just individuals who are just like US. If we discriminate against a Muslim woman who wants to live in the American mainstream, we should then not be surprised if the only Muslims we meet are angry or separatists. Finally, Abercrombie is well known for its tin ear: Does anyone else remember the "Wong Brothers Laundry: Two Wongs Can Make It White" T-shirts?

Barbara Wilcox

2:23 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

@Maureen: She would only be "forcing her choices on everyone else" if her lawsuit sought to have everyone at Abercrombie wear hijab. And to my knowledge, there is no rule at Macy's against an employee covering her hair.

Comment_arrow

Nina Parrilla

9:55 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

I have seen women working at Macy's wearing hijab on many occasions.

Dotty

2:33 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Nhu Pham :) I should add I do agree with you and Barbara Wilcox. The hijab can be incredibly fashionable, stylish, and beautiful. And wearing one doesn't mean one doesn't like fashion!

gold7246

3:35 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

She can wear her hijab when goes to pray on her prayer rug-otherwise, the company is perfectly legal in telling their employees can and cannot wear. These people, Muslims, need to get over themselves. Also, CAIR has sponsored Hamas, which is a terrorist organization.

gold7246

3:38 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

This Muslim can wear he hijab outside of her employment. Otherwise, her employer has every right to tell her what not to wear if it reflects a negative image on the business. By the way CAIR is in bed with HAMAS, which is a terrorist organization. The Muslims in this Country need to assimilate, or leave

Comment_arrow

Pat Milligan

4:10 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

What negative image would be projected by the business if a stockroom clerk wears her hajib to work? The hajib is an outward symbol of modesty and morals; would A&F prefer that they project an image that personal morals have no place in their work environment? What is the distinction between telling her she cannot wear her hajib and telling someone he cannot wear his yarmulkeh to work or telling an Orthodox woman that she can't wear her sheitel? Should the employer also forbid people to wear crosses/crucifixes? What about young people wearing purity rings (which are often given to them as part of a church service)? Where does it end?

Comment_arrow

Allee

7:56 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Gold- is that a joke? They're going to lose the lawsuit- just like the place i work at now did years ago because of the same issue.

Comment_arrow

Allee

7:59 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Oh, and how do you "know" there are terrorist muslims working with CAIR? Lastly, Why should Muslims in this country leave? - - - - MORE THAN HALF OF THEM WERE BORN HERE. That's like asking you to leave if you aren't Native American.

Stephanie Wills

3:45 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

I think its beyond ridiculous that a company that allows their employees to dress in clothing that leaves little to the imagination, would have a problem with someone wearing a headscarf. What’s the big deal? Who cares if she was wearing a headscarf? Not to mention that she wore it to her interview, and they knew when they hired her that she was a Muslim.

Not politically correct

3:50 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Don't compare Muslim men with Priests. Apples and oranges!

Try comparing Allah to Christ (or other religious leaders), who didn't marry a child, also, did that child have any say in the matter! Still happening in the Muslim religion! Also, any of the Priests who did the molesting, should be in prison.

Comment_arrow

Stephanie Wills

3:56 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Actually it happens in countries that are extremelly impoverished and it does not just occure within the Muslim religion. You need to do some research.
And I wasn't comparing Allah to Christ, I was stating that you can't judge an entire group based on the actions of a few. It's wrong to say that all Muslim men marry child brides just as it is wrong to say that all Catholic priest molest little boys.

Comment_arrow

Allee

8:00 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Stephanie- right on; I use that analogy all of the time!

Stephanie Wills

4:03 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Child brides are not because of religion, they are a result of customes.

Juu

4:10 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

What burns me the most are the comments assume there is only ONE way to be Muslim, the negative, misogynistic way where women are chattel and men have harems. Wake up people!! There are as many different ways to practice Islam as there is Christianity and Judism. There are several more orthodox brands of Christianity that require women to cover their hair, for example Minonite [sic] women don't cut their hair and wear it tucked away in a cap pinned to the hair - they don't go out in public and wear much more restrictive dress than required of many Muslim women.

Religion is NOT one size fits all, and in America we are supposed to respect everyone's religion - and have been legally barred from discriminating hiring practices for decades if not longer. Hollister is going to get their @sses handed to them court, as they should.

Comment_arrow

Stephanie Wills

5:23 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Its sad but true. Unfortunately there are way too many people who think like @not politically correct and cling to their prejudices. Ignorance always breeds hate.

Not politically correct

4:11 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

You seem to want to skip over the things you don't want to address!
Like multiple wives are allowed, many women forced to wear the veils against their wishes, not being able to drive. If the Muslim men can deny "their" women their rights, why do you say an employer cannot enforce simple work rules and dress codes. Try wearing a nun's outfit to work at most places and claim it's your right.!
You also seem to speak fast and loose with the stated facts. I didn't see it mentioned in the above article, that she wore a scarf to her interview, and that they knew she was a Muslim when they hired her.

As far as your statement----"And your comments concerning Muslims is a testament to your ignorance."
Who is really ignorant and just guesses what she wore for her interview and told her future employer?
Or were you there?

Comment_arrow

Stephanie Wills

5:14 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

First off, nuns don’t work at establishments because they already have a job with the church, that is why they are called nuns.
Second, yes there is terrible things done to women ALL over the world by ALL religions, not just Islam. Again, you need to do more research before opening your mouth and making swooping generalizations about a religion that over a million people around the world subscribe to.
And yes, I assumed she wore the headscarf to her interview because that’s what Muslim women do. They wear their headscarf EVERYWHERE in PUBLIC. There is no way that someone who is a Muslim, and wears a headscarf would ever venture out into public, even for an interview, without wearing the scarf.
I would suggest that you do some actual reading on what exactly Islam is..

Comment_arrow

Stephanie Wills

5:19 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

And by the way, you are obviously extremely biased towards Muslims and its people who think like you that make this world such a hateful and dangerous place to live.

Juu

4:12 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

* oops meant to say Minonite women do not go out in public with their hair exposed. (for the same biblical traditions as Muslim women)

Also, did you know that Mohammed recognized Jesus as a prophet of God?

Comment_arrow

mattie

5:39 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Very well put, never seen so many closed minds in this day and age, she wears her hijab because it is her way of life. Would uyou ask a nun to remove her habit? same senerio, quite sure when she was hired she wore her hijab, she has been employed for 1 year now they want her to remove it, she should take them to court,

Kayla

5:32 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

On the topic of the Muslim religion, how did she get to work? Did she drive? If not, would she sue her husband for not letting her drive? Why should she sue a place that has rules when she is obviously bound to a religion with many restrictions? BTW, if she was not in the public eye, she should be allowed to work there. But, we may not be getting the entire story. I find it hard to believe she wore her hijab to the interview and A&F is just now having an issue. Unless she did not wear it until now and is purposely making an issue to incite public sentiment.

Comment_arrow

Nina Parrilla

9:54 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

the store is a public place, it's not a private home.

Comment_arrow

nannienu

8:49 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Does it kill you that a Muslim women might have her rights infringed upon? If you read the story it says she wore her scarf the whole time! Also, the religion does not say women cannot drive or cannot work. You are thinking of Saudi Arabia a place where there are many laws that restrict people that have nothing to do with the religion. The government there says it is the religion when it actually isnt. I hope you read this comment and so you can learn more about other cultures because clearly right now you have no clue.

Comment_arrow

Debra

11:37 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

@nina Psrrilla A store is a PRIVATELY OWNED BUSINESS with PUBLIC access.

Jerry Engelbach

5:34 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Are all A&F employees forbidden to wear any and all religious symbols? Christians can't wear crosses, Jews can't wear Stars of David, and so on?

If A&F is worried about their image, this case isn't doing them any good.

Comment_arrow

Ileana

10:46 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Well, we're not really allowed to wear jewelry. No necklaces/bracelets/rings. Wedding rings are okay though. Men can't wear earrings, women are only allowed one pair and they must not be the "dangly kind". We can wear studs/hoops, but they must be smaller than a penny.

Santa Cruzan

5:36 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

If your religion requires you to wear some garb you get a job were that garb fits the image of the company. You don't get the job and then insist on changing the image of the company. CAIR has already sued Abercrombie & Fitch on this issue for tens of millions of dollars (check CAIR'S website), and it has sued Disney as well, insisting on making accommodations for a female working with the public in a modified uniform. She refused to work in a job behind the scenes, said it would be humiliating. The objective by CAIR seems to be to aggressively interject Islam into "American culture" under the threat of expensive lawsuits.

Have you ever heard of the Amish suing A & F so they can wear their traditional dresses and head coverings or Orthodox Jews or any other religious group doing this? Or suing Target so they don't have to handle non-halal meat? No. If the place of employment has a culture contrary to their beliefs they simply don't work there. So why do Muslims expect the businesses to change their dress codes?

Comment_arrow

Allee

8:10 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

What does A&F sell that makes it inappropriate for a Muslim to work there? There isn't anything there that is against their religion. Now- If this girl was working at a bar, then you'd actually have an argument-because alcohol is against Islam. And my friend works at Target. You obviously don't apply for 'meat handling'- there are certain areas certain people stick to. If you're cashier- then you're cashier.

mattie

5:40 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

I just made my comment: I am Mattie.

lisa bacon

5:42 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

i live in texas, went to renew my driver license i had on a hat and tinted glasses, i was told to take them off. two ladies in front of me were covered from head to toe i said what about those two. the clerk said we are not allowed to ask them to remove anything, yes they treat women different here in texas.

ian

5:50 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

90% of these comments are shooting in the dark. Based on perception. Based on bias. Based on a warped and ill-conceived notion of "rules". We don't know what happened. We don't know if she wore the headscarf during the interview. We don't know if Abercrombie changed their mind after agreeing to hire her with the headscarf. WE DON"T KNOW. And to be honest, it's not our business. We don't work at Abercrombie. We're not members of her family. We don't know. Especially you conservatives and Republicans. You never care about the laws or rules when people are pulled over, people are arrested, people are homeless, etc. You have nothing to say when right-wing politicians or religious figures are charged or accused of wrongdoing or corruption. You're as quiet as a mouse. Nothing. You go after the left. You go after non-whites. You go after muslims. You go after radicals. You go after outcasts and the downtrodden. The "facts" only matter when it's people that you are against or that you disagree with. That's the only time the "rules" need to be followed.

Comment_arrow

Kayla

6:04 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Not so fast Ian. It DOES affect us whether we want to believe it or not. Higher prices because of lawsuits, having to accept people because they are afraid of not being politically correct when she may not have been a good employee, inciting public sentiment against a retailer when it may not be justified. The point you are right on is we do not know what happened but the press like to inflame the public into taking sides. Perhaps that is where the blame should be.

Diane

6:04 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

This is America! When the Muslims come to this country........they should abide by our rules. Employers are getting a bad rap from people like this.......imposing their beliefs on them and expecting everyone to bow down to them because of religious belief! Well the time has come to STOP doing this and follow the rules of the land and the employer. They would be breaking the law if they were to ask these people if they are Muslim when they interview them......so they hire in good faith and then get sued for insisting the new employee follow the rules like everyone else. These groups that support these people should be banned. This is just wrong!!

Comment_arrow

Allee

8:14 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

DIANE- "..when Muslims come to this country.."
WHAT ABOUT THE MUSLIMS BORN IN THIS COUNTRY?! 90% of the people from my Mosque were BORN here. We are American.
Hire in good faith then good sued? I cannot even comment on such a stupid thing. the end.

Comment_arrow

nannienu

8:51 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Oh Allee I know exactly where you are coming from. I wish there was a like button for your comment

Thomas Al-Maruf

6:15 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

When I was a young boy I lived near a catholic school where nuns covered their heads. Nothing was said. Now I'm older and there is a lot being said about head coverings. what's the difference. Go figure.

John

6:54 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

If the policy was in place when she accepted the job and she was made aware of it during the hiring process, there's no problem. She didn't follow the rules she agreed to when she accepted the job. I have a strong feeling this is the case. I work for a school system, if any school system anywhere in the world is sued for anything down to a paper cut, we have a "policy" in place before the week is out. I'm sure a company as large as A & F has the same type of legal team. They would be stupid no too,

Julie Chris

6:58 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

This is simply a mater of what was defined for the woman when she was hired. If she came to the interview with a headscarf, was not advised that she could not wear it, and wore it every single day, then she shouldn't have been fired for it.

If on the other had, the woman didn't wear it to the interview, or wore it intermittently (as I have seen people of many religions do when practicing the edicts of their faith, Muslim included) and the policy was clear, but was delayed in enforcement, then the woman should be required to follow policy just like everyone else. Not wearing it all of the time means that she doesn't believe it to be a requirement unless it serves her needs. The article doesn't give enough information to make that determination.

Moses

8:14 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

The article doesn't seem to support the any speculation that she may have wore a scarf "intermittently." According to the press release cited, she worked "for several months in 2009-10 while wearing a hijab" and was later "terminated" for "after refusing to remove her scarf." To me, it seems pretty logical to understand that to mean that the hijab/scarf was worn consistently during that period--any other understanding would seem quite speculative and, quite honestly, groundless. It seems it was the case that an employee who's choice of attire was respected by employers for "several months" was suddenly fired for it.

Also, A&F does have a little bit of a history with discrimination--especially at a executive/marketing level. Check out this story about an employee who worked at A&F for a while without any problem but then got fired for they way she looked as well. The parallels are striking...

//Liu says she was fired after corporate officials visited the store, and, according to her, didn't like what they saw: "A corporate official had pointed to an Abercrombie poster and told our management at our store, 'You need to have more staff that looks like this.' And it was a white Caucasian male on that poster."//

(http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/05/60minutes/main587099.shtml#ixzz1QLcpaDUJ)

Don't believe that actually happened? A&F believed it. They paid $40 million to settle the case.

Allee

8:17 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Even the United States of America allows a head scarf to be worn for passport photos (with a letter by the person stating it's for religious reasons).

Timbrel

8:27 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

What?! Good Lord, What country did I wake up in? I have read explanations, some intelligent points, some dung slinging prattle (BTW smell your hands and note the hill of cow pies your standing in -- pardon me, but I had to break it down that way -- it is what it T-I-is). Point, if this woman is a devote Muslim, she could have been consistent in her attire from the outset -- interview to confrontation. Counter point -- yes, A&F has the right to convey their dress code. Point -- if A&F established their dress code from the outset, then we wouldn’t be having this discussion. Therefore, they had no problem with her attire, because she was hired and was working with it on. In truth, the crucible of this drama probably falls on the afterthought phobias of a few in a coffee clutch.

Timbrel

8:28 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

The problem seems to be that, like several of you anal retentive pseudo intellectuals, freedom, as defined by the US Constitution, only relates to your own egotistical parameters of divine providence. For example, as you demonstrated “freedom of speech,” that is as long as it agrees with your opinion. This is the greatest country in the world. For many transplanted women, Muslim or otherwise especially. However, even here women are still objectified and devalued as soon as they get older than 30yrs.

I don’t agree with everyone’s practices. However, I have learned to "tolerate" them as long as it doesn't over step reasonable social morays – that are hinged upon biblical commandments. (FYI --such as “thou shalt not steal,” “thou shalt not committee adultery”… etc.) A scarf is just a grain of sand compared to the onslaught of envelope pushers of the morally bankrupt. I defend this woman's right to wear her religious clothing, just like I defend the right of some of you to bray every time you open your mouth. It is amazing to me how some people get on their soap box about civil liberties one minute, buy lipstick for their five year-olds the next, then gasp in horror as 20-20 does an expose on sexually active tweens.

Timbrel

8:29 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

You ought to be glad that someone is upholding modesty in their household. Also remember, In the Unites States Muslim women have the choice to wear their hijab – or not. Jewish men have the choice to wear a yarmulke – or not. We all have a choice. Even God gives us a choice to receive Him -- or not. Just like Rlivingston and Daniel M have the choice to believe in God – or not, or spend eternity in hell—or not. Just like I have the right to tell them, it is written:

“The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good “ ( Psalm 14:1)

“A fool hath no delight in understanding, but that his heart may discover itself.” (Proverbs 18:2)

“The heart of the wise teacheth his mouth, and addeth learning to his lips.” (Proverbs 16:23)

Shalom Alaikum! Baruch haba B’shem Adonai Yeshua ha Mashach (Pleease forgive any misspelling)

www.bible.com

Hakim Talbi

8:29 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

I think that these perverts needs to stop their attacks against what left of religious women from all Religions.
Are they going also to force Jewish women to remove their wigs or tell them like in France that their skirts are too long. The logic is that showing skin in the name of sex is something new to this world. My son just spent about $150 at this store and it's going to be the last time inshallah.

Kitt Lenington

9:29 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

What I find appalling is the lack of basic knowledge regarding federal law. Does the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ring any bells? Abercrombie & Fitch better pull out their bestest ever cracker-jack legal team to fight this because it's going to hit the fan for them.

Some of these comments reflect not only a disgusting level of bigotry but just outright stupidity and ignorance, as in this: 'nuns don't work in establishments because they have jobs with the church.' That's not how it is any longer and hasn't been for decades. 'This is America' - thanks for the update. My America is pretty full of just about every color, creed, and ethnic group around; a beautiful hodge-podge of people. Ad nauseum....

http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/qanda_religion.html

jikiparrt

10:00 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

Even God gives us a choice to receive Him -- or not. Just like Rlivingston and Daniel M have the choice to believe in God – or not, or spend eternity in hell—or not. Just like I have the right to tell them, it is written: Watch Completed Video- http://wp.me/1sMVj

Debra

11:32 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

This woman has no valid lawsuit.

She was handed a company policy manual when she was employed.
If she failed to read it, her mistake. If she read it and felt they would have to bend the company dress code to accommodate her, her mistake.

She KNEW, when she hired in, what the dress code was. She KNEW it went against her religious beliefs. She should NEVER have taken the job.

Why did SHE FAIL to ask if wearing her headscarf was allowed in the beginning?

Just another attempt to force companies to bend to the will of the Muslims. Just another FRIVOLOUS lawsuit. I applaud A&F for standing their ground!

No company should be FORCED to change, or accommodate, their dress code for the few. Simple as that.

Comment_arrow

BOBO

1:29 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Yes Debra ,no company should bend over to few.... proliferation can be harmful to America,the land of free without scarves..G-D bless America with freedom ,beer bacon and blonde and not hiding an
ugly with a scarf..lol

zmad

2:02 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

What's funny is that in our American culture of showing off "goodies" and wearing bikinis to the beach doesn't cause guys to go crazy. Yet in a survey 98% of foreign women living in Egypt and 80% of Egyptian women reported being sexually harassed... sounds like head coverings aren't helping the problem. I've seen people post about women not being able to drive, but the fact that muslim soldiers in Libya, Egypt and Syria are raping and killing women doesn't help islam in the publics eyes either... or the "virginity tests" I'm proud to be an American and a Christian... but I still love you all... there are good muslims out there, but I've found it is mainly the ones that were born muslim and not those that actually practice regularly... living in the middle east I've found that those are the ones that practice Taqiyya and lie steal and cheat there way through life... then go to mecca wearing white

zmad

2:07 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

http://www.greenprophet.com/2011/05/women-rights-muslims-harassmap/ the link to the statistics and considering i live in the middle east I know for a fact that it is true because I witness it everyday... but you can't say anything because, for example, in Iran a woman has to bring 3 men that will confirm they say the act of sexual harassment happen or she is imprisoned... way to give power to women islam!

oh and the women in skinny jeans and tight shirts with a pound of makeup on aren't any more modest than my friend in the states just because they cover their hair, but you can keep thinking that if you want

Timbrel

2:27 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

What exactly is the Abercrombie & Fitch look?

"It's dominated by Caucasian, football-looking, blonde-hair, blue-eyed males; skinny, tall," says Lu. "You don't see any African-Americans, Asian-Americans, and that's the image that they're portraying and that they're looking for."

Liu says she was fired after corporate officials visited the store, and, according to her, didn't like what they saw: "A corporate official had pointed to an Abercrombie poster and told our management at our store, 'You need to have more staff that looks like this.' And it was a white Caucasian male on that poster."

Read more:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/05/60minutes/main587099.shtml#ixzz1QLcpaDUJ

I guess A&F will be having a sale on their swastika patched preppy jackets and their white sheet hoodies. This is so funny to me -- the idea off the image of the "all American" being of the Aryan race. FYI the look of the true "all American" is brown-skinned NATIVE which includes those people we call Mexicans -- you know -- the ones who keep crossing the border to their ancestral homelands -- that is now known as the western part of the United States!

Comment_arrow

Ileana

10:50 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

You'd actually be surprised at how many people in the company don't look anything like that, though I won't lie it helps [if you're interested in being casted/being a company model].

Timbrel

2:28 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Some of you need to stop watching the re-runs of "Friends" and understand that people of color are not the minorities on this planet. They are the majority. Europeans are historically the original terrorists and subjugators using weapons of mass destruction. I’m not trying to insight a race riot. I’m simple encouraging you to know your history before you assume a posture of knowledgeable authority about what is the image of Americans.

alan levin

4:51 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Since A and F is a company dealing with interstate commerce,
it is covered by the US Civil Rights Act which requires employer
to make reasonable accomodations. Allowing an employee to
wear a head covering is a reasonable accomodation. A and F
should be required to follow federal law.

Comment_arrow

Maryland 7

7:12 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

I just started my own religion last week. I have the right to cuss out my boss for any reason I see fit, and wear sweatpants and gym tee shirts to my corporate job. Don't like it? Fire me and I'll sue!!! Hahahahaha....

Alicia De Barri

5:31 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Abercrombie and Fitch is obviously a company run by dried-up control freaks, and anyone with any sense would never shop there.

Did the EEEVIL head scarf HURT the poor babies' widdle feelings?

Hey, A & F - if your employees are doing their jobs, leave them the hell alone, you oppressive blots on the American landscape.

And then they wonder why we need unions.

Comment_arrow

gold7246

5:47 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Alicia,

This Muslim nor does anyone else have specific right to any job. The owners of the business have a right to conduct their business the way they see fit. After all it is THEIR private property. If this Muslim doesn't want to comply with the work standards, then she can quit and go to work for someone else who will put up with her crap. So, what happens if she decides she wants to wear a burka to work, do they have to let her do that also??

Comment_arrow

Maryland 7

7:10 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Alicia, in fact, I will START shopping there to support their stance. This is how we roll in America.

leciat

6:25 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

hmmm...so i work in a suit and tie office....if i get fired for wearing shorts can i sue or do i have to have "god" on my side to do so. freedom of religion does NOT mean that the religious have rights and privileges that the rest of society do not enjoy

Maryland 7

7:03 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

This is exactly the problem with this country. This woman should go back to whatever country she came from if she insists on not complying with OUR culture. Why should A and F change their rules to accomodate HER????

I should start my own religion which calls for sleeping late every day and not needing to be at work on time. My employer wants to fire me? I'll sue!!

Comment_arrow

Kitt Lenington

8:59 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

After you, luv....

For being such a great American you don't know basic worker rights in the workplace. This is blatantly illegal and is covered under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A&F is mandated by FEDERAL law to NOT discriminate - period - regardless of an employee's religion and to make reasonable accommodations. A&F has a past record of these kinds of lawsuits.

Private companies, btw, are subject to federal laws in the workplace if they have more than 15 employees. How American is it to not even know your own rights and protections?

Comment_arrow

Maryland 7

11:36 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Actually, I do know the rules. I work in human resources! Sick and TIRED of whiny a$$ed employees and their "rights". How bout this right--you have the right to leave! Businesses will not GROW if they do not have the ability to set rules and decide how they want to run their business.. It is THEIR right.

How much was your last welfare check?

nannienu

9:00 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

I have a few questions about this article. I am from Australia and so I am not certain of the laws within the US but I am very curious about the 'look policy.' A dress code would be one thing, all work places have them. But does a 'look policy' mean all employees have to stick to a certain 'look?' Does this mean that they hire and fire on on the grounds of how attractive someone is? Surely something like that is not legal?
As for these comments blasting the Islamic religion. I understand that some Muslims are very strict in their ways but this can be the case in ALL religions. I am a catholic and I know many catholics that are far more extreme than I. I would not want to be judged by outsiders who think I am something which I am not. I am sure everyone feels this way. Wouldnt it be the same for Islamic people?
Finally, why would the employers be so slack on their staff and their 'look policy' and suddenly just change their minds? Were they being racist or was it a complete overhall? Maybe their was new management that was sick of all the staff not following the rules. Would it be fair to say that if she were disciplined more harshly than the other staff that she absolutely has a case?

Comment_arrow

Ileana

10:38 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Not everyone who works in the stores would be considered "attractive". The look policy has mostly to do with clothing and grooming. Examples include: No fake nails/acrylics, no facial hair, no facial piercings, no unnatural hair colors etc. Basically we are to look as natural as possible and try to wear styles that they are currently promoting.

Ross

9:30 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

@Maryland 7 can you please describe what "our" culture is please? This is America, a cultural melting pot, we don't really have a culture. American culture comes from many different cultures, unless of course you were referring to a white racist culture of feeling entitled to a country that never belonged to you. A country that was stolen from a nation of people that has been marginalized. What is our culture??? I don't think you will or can actually answer this question. In almost positive you'll skirt the question and rant about something else. But if you get around to answering the question I'd like an answer to how a country built on immigration has on culture. PS this isn't your country it's our country meaning everyone that wad born here, white, black, yellow, red, Jew, christian, Muslim, etc

Comment_arrow

Maryland 7

11:32 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Yes, Ross, all whites are racist. YOu got it!! Ding! What a whiner you are. I am a native american and I have more room to speak than you do, my friend. So get out of MY country with your ignorant statements. Now.

Ross

9:32 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Please excise my typos and brevity as I am on my handheld device

Ross

9:34 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

Learn to practice tolerance instead of hate. But those that hate don't see it as hate, and if you say anything like " this is our country" or "they can go back to where they came from" or " our culture" just know that you are an ignorant racist

Comment_arrow

Maryland 7

11:30 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

you are an ignorant racist for not respecting my values. Probably Canadian. Go home, too,

Comment_arrow

Maryland 7

11:33 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

I am openly weeping at your post. You brought me to tears. Sniff Sniff!!!

Megan Shackelford

10:44 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

I think the point here is not about whether or not women SHOULD wear head scarves it's about FREEDOM, something that "our country" was supposedly founded on. There's a reason why freedom of religion and speech is the FIRST amendment! Also, I consider myself a feminist on many levels and I am not a Muslim, BUT, I believe that women should have the choice to practice whatever religion they choose and wear what ever they choose, whether it be a head scarf or a revealing tank top. And by the way it is a choice, at least it is in "our culture". Perhaps it's not a choice in the cultures of extremists but this is not about extremists, it's about freedom. Let the girl have her freedom and let her wear whatever she wants.

Comment_arrow

Maryland 7

11:34 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

And A and F should have the right to set rules to run their company and establish a dress code however they would like.

Here's a better idea! Let's just ABOLISH all business her in America, and we can all LIVE OFF THE GOVERNMENT!! Yeah!

Dotty

10:57 am on Sunday, June 26, 2011

For those of you claiming Islam oppresses women, Indonesia has the largest Muslim population in the world and they've had a woman president. How many women presidents has the US had? What's that? I, I can't hear you... speak up... how many?? Seriously people, get educated about Islam, women, and American law. Telling Americans to "go back where they came from" is racist. I want to live in America, not AMURRICA!

The editor has closed comments for this article.